It examines the relationship between evaluation and policy change, explores mechanisms for effective democratic evaluation and addresses how these mechanisms can be integrated into evaluation design. Using criteria put forth by Ernest House and Kenneth Howe in their paper, 'Deliberative Democratic Evaluation' (2000), it discusses how inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation can allow citizen/stakeholders to contribute to the legitimization of public policy and to participate in decision making in a meaningful way
Deliberative Democratic Evaluation 2011.pdf
Narco-terrorism, Hurricanes Ike, Dolly and Alex, and relentless media attention to immigration issues form the backdrop for a process evaluation and feasibility assessment of the Border Violence Prevention Task Force community mobilization efforts in 2010. With funding provided by the Texas...
AEA 2011 Presentation Anaheim.ppt